No Mean City: The World of Architecture, As Seen From Toronto

Oct 26

Norman Foster, skyscrapers and imaginary parks: the Metro Toronto Convention Centre proposal

2012 / Categories: Uncategorized

that Oxford Properties, the large developer that owns the Convention Centre and adjacent land in the middle of downtown Toronto, is aiming high with its redevelopment plan. They are proposing two high-rises that would top 1,000 feet.

I have two points on this. One, if anybody should build truly super-tall skyscrapers in Toronto, Foster and Partners are a good choice. And two, it’s not going to happen.

Let me explain.

Foster is one of the great corporate architects of our time. He has built a massive office that  produces large and high-quality buildings around the world, with great technical facility and some of the artistry that made him a cultural force 40 years ago. The Hearst Tower in New York may be the best skyscraper of the past generation: formally expressive, spatially interesting, and (so I read) very well-planned and well-detailed. It is also LEED Gold certified and (by North American standards) genuinely green, with operable windows, energy conservation techniques and rainwater collection. So: If someone’s going to design megatowers here, we could do worse.

There’s that Gherkin thing, too – which despite its UFO-like incongruity in London’s medieval heart, is quite brilliant.

Foster have Toronto connections, too: they have collaborated with Toronto-based firm Adamson Associates, and Foster is already working here, master-panning a massive 13-acre site in the Port Lands, as I reported in 2011.

So why am I skeptical? One, for the obvious reason: building on this scale is risky. Profitable, if it works out, but potentially catastrophic if the demands of selling a massive project take too long.

And two, because the developers Oxford Properties are clearly floating trial balloons rather than solidly costed ideas. , and showing pretty pictures of a dramatic park suspended over the rail corridor – these are the tactics of people with a game-changing property at a pivotal moment, trying to see how far they can stretch the city’s planning regimen and its ideas of the right way to build a city.

Pretty picture from Oxford Properties

If any of this gets built in this market cycle I will be pleased. (Except the casino.) the convention centre that exists now is an urbanistic disaster on a site that, now, deserves better.

But don’t be surprised if these images shimmer and vanish, mirage-like, and reveal a more modest reality.

4 comments on Norman Foster, skyscrapers and imaginary parks: the Metro Toronto Convention Centre proposal

  1. Jason Paris
    on Oct 26, 2012
    at 3:24 pm 

    I understand why there would be massive logtical/ownership issues with buildilng a park over the rail corrdior, but I also don’t think its as out of the realm of possibility as some are suggesting. Casino or not, a park over the corridor would be most welcome and shouldn’t be totally discounted. I’m just saying it’s perhaps part of the project to rally-around instead of discount.

  2. Alex
    on Oct 26, 2012
    at 3:55 pm 

    It’s not a bad idea! Just an exceedingly difficult one. When I see Oxford making a deal with the railways and Metrolinx, then I’ll be excited.

  3. BLDG Workshop
    on Oct 30, 2012
    at 10:25 pm 

    [...] piece and insight regarding Toronto architectural hoopla and posturing, via @alexbozikovic… October 31 [...]

  4. EVENT: Andrew Blum explores the Internet « nomeancity nomeancity
    on Nov 6, 2012
    at 10:39 pm 

    [...] He drank with divers on the Portuguese coast, spelunked Lower Manhattan with Con Edison engineers (!), schmoozed with many network technicians in many dark rooms full of wire cages. (In Toronto, the Toronto Internet Exchange is here on Front Street West. For now!) [...]

Leave a Reply

© 2009 nomeancity. All Rights Reserved.

This blog is powered by Wordpress and Linseed Projects.